1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 220 Cal.App.3d
  5. 220 Cal.App.3d 1297 (1990)
 

WARREN v. WASSERMAN, COMDEN & CASSELMAN

Docket No. G008686.

220 Cal.App.3d 1297 (1990)

271 Cal. Rptr. 579

DAVID WARREN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WASSERMAN, COMDEN & CASSELMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

May 29, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

David Warren, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wasserman, Comden & Casselman, Catherine H. Stevenson, Slott & Diamond and Jeffrey A. Slott, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

COX, J.*

Plaintiff David Warren appeals from orders sustaining a demurrer as to one count and granting summary judgment as to the other two counts of his complaint for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. We affirm.1

FACTS

In January 1985 Warren filed an action for breach of contract and misrepresentation on behalf of his clients, Jane and Thomas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases