WOOLFOLK v. VAN RU CREDIT CORP.

Civ. No. N 88-268 (EBB).

783 F.Supp. 724 (1990)

Raymond WOOLFOLK, et al. v. VAN RU CREDIT CORP.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 2, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joanne S. Faulkner, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiffs.

James J. Carroll, Gillooly, McGrail, Carroll & Sheedy, New Haven, Conn., for defendant.


RULING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ELLEN B. BURNS, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment as to liability, on the basis that there is no dispute as to the material facts which establish the defendant has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1692, et seq. ("FDCPA"). For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs' motion is...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases