U.S. v. RICO

No. 88-1286.

895 F.2d 602 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip RICO, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Bettencourt, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.

Michael K. Kawahara, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SNEED, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Phillip Rico, Jr. contends that the sentence he received, after pleading guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine, violated his due process rights and failed to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 ("Rule 32"). We vacate the district court's sentence and remand for resentencing in compliance with Rule 32(c)(3)(D).

FACTS

Rico pleaded guilty to one count of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases