1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 788 S.W.2d
  5. 788 S.W.2d 696 (1990)
 

HOUSTON v. MIKE BLACK AUTO SALES, INC.

No. 13-89-364-CV.

788 S.W.2d 696 (1990)

Morris HOUSTON, et al., Appellants, v. MIKE BLACK AUTO SALES, INC., et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

April 19, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Houston, Houston, Marek & Griffin, Victoria, for appellants.

James A. Smith, Port Lavaca, for appellee.

Before NYE, C.J., and BENAVIDES and DORSEY, JJ.

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This suit is submitted under the provisions of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. 17.41 et seq. (Vernon 1987). Appellants, Morris and Hazel Houston, appeal the directed verdict rendered in favor of appellees, Mike Black Auto Sales, Inc. and Mike W. Black, individually. By a single point of error, appellants allege that the trial court erred by preventing the jury from deciding the issues presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases