SCHOONOVER v. LCDC

89-EO-491; CA A62037.

799 P.2d 679 (1990)

104 Or.App. 155

John SCHOONOVER, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 24, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Philip Arnold, Ashland, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief, was Drescher & Arnold, Ashland.

Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC's enforcement order, which prohibits Klamath County from approving building permits or mobile home permits for nonforest dwellings on petitioner's property, unless the county satisfies six justifying criteria that are set out in the order. ORS 197.320.1

The property is an 80-acre tract in a forest zone. In November, 1988, the county approved conditional use permits for 16...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases