STOKES v. TATMAN

No. 18807.

803 P.2d 673 (1990)

111 N.M. 188

Jerry STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Frank TATMAN and Cathy Tatman, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

December 19, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hawthorne & Hawthorne, Charles E. Hawthorne, Ruidoso, for defendants-appellants.

Catron, Catron & Sawtell, Kathrin Kinzer-Ellington, Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.


OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

On the Court's own motion, the decision filed herein on November 19, 1990 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

Defendants Richard and Cathy Tatman appeal from the district court judgment in favor of plaintiff Jerry Stokes for recovery on a promissory note. We affirm.

FACTS

In June 1986, appellant Richard Tatman (Richard) and his wife Cathy Tatman (Cathy) were living on a tract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases