1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 789 S.W.2d
  5. 789 S.W.2d 682 (1990)
 

BAKER v. HAMMETT

No. 6-90-002-CV.

789 S.W.2d 682 (1990)

Wanda BAKER, Appellant, v. Doyle HAMMETT, Dorothy Fae Berry, James Hammett, Edward Hammett, Betty Ragon, and Ruby Mae Hammett, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.

May 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian Dicus, Law Offices of Joseph E. Ashmore, P.C., Dallas, for appellant.

Jack G. Kennedy, Kennedy, Minshew, Campbell & Fry, Sherman, for appellees.

BLEIL, Justice.

Wanda Baker, who had been appointed as independent executrix of the estate of Hubert Lee Hammett, appeals from a judgment removing her as independent executrix. Baker contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that a loan had been repaid and that there is no evidence of findings which form the basis of its removal of her as independent executrix. While we find sufficient evidence to support the trial court's factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases