1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 789 P.2d
  5. 789 P.2d 679 (1990)
 

DONALD H. HARTVIG v. CLACKAMAS TOWN CENTER

No. 83-3-422; CA A49514.

789 P.2d 679 (1990)

101 Or.App. 79

DONALD H. HARTVIG, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. CLACKAMAS TOWN CENTER Associates, a Limited Partnership, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Tanzer, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland.

Lee Aronson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Schulte, Anderson, DeFrancq, Downes & Carter, P.C., Portland.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

GRABER, Presiding Judge.

This is an action for damages for fraud in the inducement of a lease. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on its claim for punitive damages. We reverse.

In reviewing a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the jury rendered its verdict. Roberts v. Coleman et al, 228 Or. 286, 288,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases