1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 798 P.2d
  5. 798 P.2d 663 (1990)
 

DENNEHY v. ROBERTS

CC 90C-11740, CA A66633, SC S37507 (Control); CC 90C-11584, CA A66632, SC S37508.

798 P.2d 663 (1990)

310 Or. 394

Thomas P. DENNEHY and Martin L. Buchanan, Respondents, v. Barbara ROBERTS, Secretary of State, Anthony Meeker, Fred D. Miller and Richard A. Munn, and Dick Sohrt, Appellants, and Mark Nelson, Gregory Kafoury, Elaine Kelley and Lloyd K. Marbet, Intervenor-Appellants. Lon T. Mabon, Respondent, v. Barbara Roberts, Secretary of State, Anthony Meeker, Fred D. Miller and Richard A. Munn, Appellants, and Mark Nelson, Gregory Kafoury, Elaine Kelley and Lloyd K. Marbet, Intervenor-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided October 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for appellants. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Gregory Byrne, of Byrne & Barrow, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief, for respondents Dennehy and Buchanan.

Henry S. Kane, Beaverton, and Melanie E. Mansell, Wilsonville, argued the cause, for respondent Mabon. Melanie E. Mansell filed a brief, on behalf of respondent Mabon.

James N. Gardner, of Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland, argued the cause, for intervenor-appellant Mark Nelson. With him on the brief, was Rick T. Haselton, Portland.

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, argued the cause, for intervenor-appellants Gregory Kafoury, Elaine Kelley, and Lloyd K. Marbet. With him on the brief, was Linda K. Williams, Portland.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and CARSON, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ.

PETERSON, Chief Justice.

These consolidated cases come to us on an appeal certified from the Court of Appeals, challenging the judgments of the Marion County Circuit Court. Those judgments enjoin the Secretary of State from printing fiscal impact estimates for Ballot Measures 5, 8 and 11 on the November general election ballot or in the Voters' Pamphlet. We affirm the circuit court judgments.

ORS 250.125 provides:

"When a state measure involves expenditure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases