LATHAM v. HANEY SEED CO.

No. 17512.

807 P.2d 645 (1990)

119 Idaho 427

James W. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANEY SEED COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Petition for Review Granted July 31, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-appellant. Lloyd J. Webb argued.

Holland & Hart, Langroise, Sullivan, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Debra K. Ellers argued.

Before WALTERS, C.J., SWANSTROM, J., and BENGSTON, J., Pro Tem.


PER CURIAM.

James Latham appeals from the summary judgment barring his claim to the benefits of two life insurance policies purchased for him by his former employer. The district court dismissed Latham's suit because the two-year limitation period applicable to collection of wages had passed. I.C. § 45-608. We will address whether the insurance benefits sought by Latham are "wages" as defined by I.C. § 45-609(3) and whether the employment contracts fall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases