1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 799 P.2d
  5. 799 P.2d 648 (1990)
 

LAURSEN v. MORRIS

A8804-02156; CA A60750.

799 P.2d 648 (1990)

103 Or.App. 538

John LAURSEN, Respondent, v. Jeanne and Ted MORRIS, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Reconsideration Denied November 28, 1990.

Decided October 10, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam F. Speerstra, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Rhoten, Speerstra, Rinehart & Ashcroft, Salem.

H. Paul Montgomery, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Karen G. Thompson, and Acker, Underwood, Norwood & Hiefield, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and ROSSMAN, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Defendants appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict for conversion that awarded general and punitive damages. We affirm.

Defendants Jeanne and Ted Morris are husband and wife. Jeanne wrote a book on numerology. Her husband compiled the manuscript and organized and entered it on a computer. Plaintiff is a book designer. He works with an author's manuscript and makes decisions concerning the size and style of type, placement and size of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases