1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 916 F.2d
  5. 916 F.2d 516 (1990)
 

ASHTON-TATE CORP. v. ROSS

No. 89-15683.

916 F.2d 516 (1990)

ASHTON-TATE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. Richard ROSS; Bravo Technologies, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., McCloskey & Kays, Menlo Park, Cal., for defendants-counterclaimants-appellants.

Gary L. Reback, Fenwick, Davis & West, Palo Alto, Cal., for plaintiff-counterdefendant-appellee.

Before CHOY, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves a dispute over the copyright ownership of a computer spread-sheet program called "Full Impact" and the alleged misappropriation of Appellants' trade secrets by Ashton-Tate. The district court published its order granting summary judgment on all claims in favor of Ashton-Tate. Ashton-Tate v. Ross, 728 F.Supp. 597 (N.D.Cal.1989). Appellants, Richard Ross and his company Bravo Technologies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases