1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 794 P.2d
  5. 794 P.2d 632 (1990)
 

IDAHO FALLS REDEV. AGENCY v. COUNTRYMAN

No. 18239.

794 P.2d 632 (1990)

118 Idaho 43

IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Petitioner, v. James COUNTRYMAN and Richard Hale, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 3, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elam, Burke & Boyd, Boise, for petitioner. Ryan P. Armbruster argued.

Anderson, Pike & Bush, Idaho Falls, for respondents. Dale W. Storer argued.

BOYLE, Justice.

In this original proceeding we are called upon to determine whether sufficient reasons and extraordinary conditions exist to warrant issuance of a writ of mandamus.1

The city of Idaho Falls established the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter "Agency") pursuant to the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965. I.C. § 50-2001 et seq. The Idaho Urban Renewal Law authorizes each municipality within the state of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases