GAMBILL v. BONDED OIL CO.

No. 89-703.

52 Ohio St. 3d 90 (1990)

GAMBILL, APPELLEE, ET AL., v. BONDED OIL COMPANY, APPELLANT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 27, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.S. Gallon & Associates, James D. Dennis, Gump & Elliott Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey D. Slyman, for appellee.

Joe Simmons, Oxley, Malone, Fitzgerald & Hollister and Julie A. Davenport, for appellant.


SWEENEY, J.

Bonded argues that when applying a new statute of limitations which would shorten the period of limitation of a particular cause of action, it is the enactment date and not the effective date from which the reasonableness of the time period to enforce one's existing substantive rights should and must be measured. Defendant submits that under the instant factual context, since the injured plaintiff had one hundred seventy-five days from the enactment date...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases