1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 802 P.2d
  5. 802 P.2d 611 (1990)
 

LOVE v. HARLEM IRR. DIST.

No. 90-094.

802 P.2d 611 (1990)

Clinton LOVE and Rosemary Love, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HARLEM IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Lary Mohar and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants and Respondents, Clinton LOVE and Rosemary Love, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Knute KULBECK, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided December 4, 1990.

Rehearing Denied January 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Irving, Glasgow, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Robert D. Morrison and Kathleen H. Richardson, Morrison, Young, Melcher, Brown & Richardson, Havre, for defendants and respondents.

WEBER, Justice.

When the Harlem Irrigation District discontinued delivery of water to the Loves for failure to pay water assessments, Loves brought suit against the Irrigation District for failure to give adequate notice. The District Court of the Seventeenth Judicial District, Blaine County, granted the defendants motion for summary judgment based on immunity. From that order, plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

The sole issue for our review is: Did the District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases