1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 795 P.2d
  5. 795 P.2d 607 (1990)
 

LORD v. PETTIBON

83-6-27 and 85-11-312; CA A42199.

795 P.2d 607 (1990)

102 Or.App. 607

Steven B. LORD, Respondent, and Daniel E. Beeson, Plaintiff, v. Burl R. PETTIBON, Appellant. Burl R. Pettibon, Appellant, v. Steven B. Lord, Respondent, and Daniel E. Beeson, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig D. White, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

J. Patrick O'Malley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Frank M. Parisi and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson, & Young, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Thankfully, we do not have to recite all of the convoluted procedural history of this case, because we grant respondent Lord's motion to dismiss the appeal.1

Pettibon appeals from a judgment in an action for an accounting of a partnership composed of Lord, Beeson and Pettibon. In the trial court, Lord and Pettibon stipulated to a settlement, under which Pettibon sold his interest in the partnership...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases