STINSON v. GAF CORP.

Civ. A. No. 88-1691.

757 F.Supp. 644 (1990)

James W. STINSON and Letha L. Stinson, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. GAF CORPORATION, in its own right and as successor in interest to the Ruberoid Company, The Celotex Corp., in its own right and successor in interest to the Philip Carey Mfg. Co., Philip Carey Corp., Briggs Mfg. Co. and/or Panacon Corp., Flintkote Company, Asbestos Corp., Ltd., Garlock, Inc., and Turner & Newall, PLC, in its own right and as successor in interest to Keasbey & Mattison Co., and Manville Fund, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

September 18, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Antonio Pyle, Janice Savinas, and Joel Persky, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

L. Jane Charlton, John A. Bacharach, Jan Swensen, Daniel Mcdyer, Pittsburgh, Pa., Fredric Goldfein, Philadelphia, Pa., and Ollie Hawkins, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have filed the above action against a number of defendants, including defendant Flintkote Company, alleging that during the course of his employment the plaintiff-husband used and/or was exposed to asbestos substance and asbestos-containing products of the various defendants. As a result of this use and/or exposure, plaintiff-husband has allegedly developed an asbestos-related medical condition.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases