1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 60 Wn.
  5. 60 Wn. App. 79 (1990)
 

CARRIGAN v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BD.

No. 24401-9-I.

60 Wn. App. 79 (1990)

802 P.2d 813

ANDREW CARRIGAN, ET AL, Respondents, v. THE CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, Petitioner.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

December 31, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher E. Mathews (Ramon de la Guardia, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel), for petitioner.

Richard Beal and John Ohnstad, Jr., for respondents.

WINSOR, J.

The California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) appeals an order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. It contends the trial court erred in finding jurisdiction under RCW 4.28.185(1)(a) and (b), and in failing to rule that the exercise of jurisdiction in this case violates due process. We reverse the trial court and dismiss the action against CHRB.

In early 1989, Andrew Carrigan and John Love (hereinafter Respondents) purchased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases