NICOLAI-MORGAN PROD. v. EMPLOYMENT DIV.

89-AB-524-A; CA A60998.

795 P.2d 598 (1990)

102 Or.App. 578

NICOLAI-MORGAN PRODUCTS CO., Petitioner — Cross-Respondent. v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent — Cross-Petitioner, and Jeffrey L. Meacham, Respondent — Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 25, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Riewald, Portland, argued the cause, for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the brief, were Lester V. Smith, Jr. and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, P.C., Portland.

Diane S. Lefkow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent — cross-petitioner. With her on the brief, were David B. Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Martha C. Evans, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondent — cross-respondent. With her on the brief, was DePaolis, Evans, Shepard & Vallerand, Eugene.

Before GRABER, P.J. Pro Tem., JOSEPH, C.J., and EDMONDS, J.


GRABER, Presiding Judge Pro Tem.

Employer seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that allowed unemployment benefits to claimant. Employer argues that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits during a strike. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.1

Claimant worked for employer as a door inspector. He belonged to the Western Council of Industrial Workers, Local 3035 (union). After a collective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases