GESHWIND v. GARRICK

No. 85 Civ. 2136 (RPP).

734 F.Supp. 644 (1990)

David M. GESHWIND, Plaintiff, v. Edward GARRICK, Individually, Edward Garrick Productions, Inc., the Science Museum of Minnesota, and the Association for Computing Machinery, Defendants. EDWARD GARRICK PRODUCTIONS, INC. and the Association for Computing Machinery, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Judson ROSEBUSH and Digital Effects, Inc., Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Amended April 16, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne C. Avellone, New York City (Anthony H. Handal, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Lehrer, New York City (Slade Metcalf, Mark H. Jackson, of counsel), for defendants and third-party plaintiffs.

Peter A. Silverstein, New York City, for third-party defendants.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff David Geshwind instituted this action in 1985 against Edward Garrick individually, and Edward Garrick Productions, Inc. (Productions), the producer of a computer animation film entitled "The Magic Egg," and against The Science Museum of Minnesota (SMM) and The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), organizations which have exhibited The Magic Egg.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases