IN RE STUART R. MEYERS PATENT LITIGATION

MDL No. 777. Nos. 88 Civ. 7401 (RO), 88 Civ. 7404 (RO) and 89 Civ. 5699 (RO).

731 F.Supp. 640 (1990)

In re STUART R. MEYERS PATENT LITIGATION. Stuart R. MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. ASICS TIGER CORP., Defendant. Stuart R. MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. HYDE ATHLETIC INDUSTRIES, Defendant. Stuart R. MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. ASICS CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 6, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York City, for plaintiff; Robert C. Faber, Samuel H. Weiner, Steven I. Weisburd and William O. Gray, III, of counsel.

Christie, Parker & Hale, Pasadena, Cal., for defendant Asics Tiger Corp.; Carl Kustin, of counsel.

Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, Boston, Mass., for Hyde Athletic Industries; David Wolf, John L. Welch and Warren A. Kaplan, of counsel.

Dike, Bronstein, Roberts & Cushman, Boston, Mass., for defendant Asics Corp.; Gregory D. Williams, of counsel.


OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Stuart Meyers holds three patents for cushioned running shoe insole designs, issued in 1981, 1984 and 1986 respectively. The issue raised by this motion is whether plaintiff's patent claims against these two shoe manufacturers, Hyde Athletic Industries and Asics Corporation, and against Asics Tiger Corp. ("ATC"), a retailer and subsidiary of Asics, are barred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases