1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 217 Cal.App.3d
  5. 217 Cal.App.3d 1146 (1990)
 

NEW DAVIDSON BRICK CO. v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Docket No. E005946.

217 Cal.App.3d 1146 (1990)

266 Cal. Rptr. 432

NEW DAVIDSON BRICK COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Defendants and Respondents; JOHN HARVILL et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

February 6, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Reid & Hellyer, Enos C. Reid, Dan G. McKinney and J. Craig Williams for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Best, Best & Krieger, Richard T. Anderson, Eugene Tanaka and Christian E. Hearn for Defendants and Respondents.

Dye, Thomas, Luebs & Mort, William E. Thomas and Craig G. Riemer for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

This case concerns the formation of a "community facilities district" (hereinafter, district) by the respondent County of Riverside (hereinafter, County) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Gov. Code, § 53311 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act and/or cited by statutory section numbers only). In particular, the dispute comes before us as a result of a challenge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases