1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 736 F.Supp.
  5. 736 F.Supp. 614 (1990)
 

U.S. EX REL. STINSON, ET AL. v. PRUDENTIAL INS.

Civ. A. No. 90-526.

736 F.Supp. 614 (1990)

UNITED STATES ex rel. STINSON, LYONS, GERLIN & BUSTAMANTE, Plaintiff, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

May 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tracy E. Tomlin, Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff.

William G. Kopit, Epstein, Becker & Green, Washington, D.C. and Robert E. Turtz, Epstein, Becker & Green, Princeton, N.J., for defendant.

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, the law firm of Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante ("the law firm"), has commenced this suit under the qui tam1 provisions of the False Claims Act, ("the FCA") 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b) et seq. The law firm seeks damages and civil penalties arising from alleged false statements and claims made by defendant, The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential") in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases