DONALDSON v. LANE CTY. L. GOV. BDRY. COM'N

LGBC 863, 864, 865; CA A44848 (control), A44849, A44850, LGBC 871; CA A45837, LGBC 873, 874, 875; CA A46545 (control), A46546, A46547, SC S35703.

795 P.2d 549 (1990)

310 Or. 168

Edward S. DONALDSON, Elizabeth R. Donaldson, and Herbert D. Jacobsen, Petitioners On Review, v. LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION, an Agency of the State of Oregon, Respondent On Review, and City of Eugene, Intervenor/Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 17, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Birnie, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition, for petitioners on review.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the response, for respondent on review. With him on the response, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Timothy J. Sercombe, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the responses, for the intervenor/respondent on review. With him on the response, was Harrang, Long, Watkinson & Arnold, P.C., Eugene.

Gregory W. Bryne, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief, on behalf of amicus curiae Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee.

Matthew R. Baines, Asst. City Atty., Gresham, and Jeffrey L. Rogers, City Atty., Portland, filed a brief, on behalf of amici curiae City of Gresham and City of Portland.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LINDE, CARSON, JONES, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN and FADELEY, JJ.


GILLETTE, Justice.

This is a case of judicial review of seven orders of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission (the Boundary Commission) annexing seven different parcels in the unincorporated Lane County community of Santa Clara to the City of Eugene (Eugene). Petitioners, who are individual residents of Santa Clara, seek review in this court, claiming that: (1) the annexations were unlawful because Santa Clara was a "proposed city," and territory in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases