HARVEY v. DIST. OF COL. BD. OF ELECTIONS

Nos. 90-1197, 90-1203.

581 A.2d 757 (1990)

Jim HARVEY and R. Rochelle Burns, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent, Janice Jackson and Luther Marsh, Intervenors.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 9, 1990.

Rehearing En Banc Denied January 15, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Messick and Roger S. Ballentine, for petitioner Harvey.

R. Rochelle Burns, pro se.

William H. Lewis, with whom Alice P. McCrory was on the brief, for respondent.

Maurice Joseph, for intervenors.

Before TERRY, STEADMAN, and SCHWELB, Associate Judges.


SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

I

Petitioners Harvey and Burns have asked this court to review a decision of the Board of Elections and Ethics of the District of Columbia (the Board)1 holding that each had failed to qualify for inclusion on the November 6, 1990 ballot as a candidate for an "at large" seat on the Council of the District of Columbia. The Board ruled that both Harvey and Burns had failed to submit petitions bearing 3...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases