HUNTINGTON NATL. BANK v. ELKINS

No. 89-1020.

53 Ohio St. 3d 79 (1990)

HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. ELKINS, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Gordon W. Johnston, George M. Hauswirth and Carole D. Weiss, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Legal Aid Society of Columbus and Leslie Varnado, Jr., for appellee and cross-appellant.


HOLMES, J.

The narrow issue presented for our review is whether price alone is determinative of "commercial reasonableness." For the reasons which follow we answer this query in the negative and reverse the court of appeals.

The right of a secured party to dispose of collateral after a debtor's default is codified at R.C. 1309.47 (U.C.C. 9-504). R.C. 1309.47(C) requires that "* * * every aspect of the disposition including the method, manner, time, place,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases