1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 759 F.Supp.
  5. 759 F.Supp. 556 (1990)
 

HURT v. DOW CHEMICAL CO.

No. 90-0783-C(3).

759 F.Supp. 556 (1990)

Irene HURT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

September 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Coffey, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Frank N. Gundlach, Mary C. Kickham, Armstrong Teasdale Schlafly Davis & Dicus, St. Louis, Mo., for Dow Chemical Co.

Margaret E. Gangle, Geissal & Gangle, John D. Warner, Jr., Kortenhof & Ely, St. Louis, Mo., for Rose Exterminators.

ORDER

HUNGATE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant Dow Chemical Company's ("Dow Chemical") motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs oppose the motion.

Pursuant to this Court's diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff Irene Hurt seeks damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained after being exposed to defendant Dow Chemical's product, Dursban. Plaintiff Mark Hurt, Irene...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases