MADDOX, Justice.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge correctly held that the provisions of three policies of excess insurance held by the injured party's employer provided no uninsured motorist benefits to the injured party, who was injured when he was involved in an automobile accident with a phantom vehicle. The trial judge entered a summary judgment for each of the three excess carriers.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.