GLENPOINTE ASSOC. v. TEANECK TP.


12 N.J. Tax 118 (1990)

GLENPOINTE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Amster argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Amster & Rosensweig, attorneys, Daniel Amster, of counsel and on the brief with Barry J. Cohen).

Edward G. Rosenblum argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Rosenblum & Rosenblum, attorneys, Edward G. Rosenblum, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BAIME and KEEFE.


PER CURIAM.

These are appeals by the taxpayer from the judgments of the Tax Court which reduced assessments to some extent for the years 1984, 1985, 1986 and 1987. These are the assessments in issue:

Block   Lot       1984            1985            1986           1987
3720     5     $31,095,700     $35,301,700    ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases