KRUG v. IMBORDINO

No. 88-15222.

896 F.2d 395 (1990)

Lawrence J. KRUG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vince IMBORDINO; Rufino Dominguez; Arthur Hanratty; Maricopa County, AZ; James Martin; Garth Smith; State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 15, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence J. Krug, Florence, Ariz., plaintiff-appellant, pro se.

Barbara L. Caldwell, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Lawrence Krug appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (1982). He alleges numerous improprieties in connection with a 1979 search, arrest and confinement, and a 1980 arrest, seizure of property, bail denial, confinement, and plea agreement. Because Krug's claims are either barred by the statute of limitations or are meritless, we affirm.

I

Krug...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases