HUGHES v. OHIO BELL TELEPHONE CO.

No. 89-3635.

916 F.2d 367 (1990)

Martin J. HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 18, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard G. Ross (argued) and Marc I. Strauss, Chattman, Garfield, Friedlander & Paul, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas A. Linton (argued) and Kevin M. Sullivan, Ohio Bell Telephone Co., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.

Before JONES and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge.


BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

After granting Martin J. Hughes a number of leaves of absence to engage in union management relations, Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Ohio Bell) refused to grant Hughes an additional one, and recalled him to work. Hughes sued Ohio Bell in Ohio state court, contending that Ohio Revised Code section 4113.40 provided him with a right to additional leaves of absence to engage in union management relations.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases