1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 912 F.2d
  5. 912 F.2d 366 (1990)
 

WILSON ARLINGTON CO. v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO.

No. 88-6273.

912 F.2d 366 (1990)

WILSON ARLINGTON COMPANY; Selden Ring; Irving Axelrad, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 27, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hillel Chodos, Gina Putkoski, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kenneth B. Bley, Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before NELSON, BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

The answer to the question presented in this appeal is, yes, Virginia, there is a parol evidence rule.

I

In early 1984, Prudential put up for sale one of its hotel properties — the Arlington Hyatt Hotel located in Arlington, Virginia. Prudential circulated a limited number of informational brochures describing the property and offering it for $26.5 million. Selden Ring, a partner in Wilson Arlington, responded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases