1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 750 F.Supp.
  5. 750 F.Supp. 524 (1990)
 

U.S. v. HILL

Crim. A. No. 1:90-cr-66-HLM.

750 F.Supp. 524 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William Franklin HILL, Jr., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

September 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cliffe Lane Gort, Gort Hassett Cohen & Beitchman, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant.

Robert Francis Schroeder, Office of U.S. Atty., N.D.Ga., Atlanta, Ga., for U.S.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

I.

On April 6, 1990, the Defendant gave notice pursuant to Rule 12.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that he intended to avail himself of an insanity defense. In this motion the Defendant, who is charged with numerous counts of bank and wire fraud, is seeking to challenge the constitutionality of the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 ("IDRA" or "Act"). 18 U.S.C. § 17.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases