1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 910 F.2d
  5. 910 F.2d 357 (1990)
 

OLLE v. HENRY & WRIGHT CORP.

Nos. 89-3532, 89-3615.

910 F.2d 357 (1990)

Frank OLLE, Jr.; Automatic Press Corporation; and James W. Cato, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The HENRY & WRIGHT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 9, 1990.

Rehearing Denied September 10, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Sheehan, Sheehan & Sheehan, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee Frank Olle, Jr.

Nicholas Phillips (argued), Stewart S. Wilson, North Royalton, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellees Automatic Press Corp. and James W. Cato.

William D. Beyer, Kathleen M. Dugan, Wuliger, Fadel & Beyer, Roger L. Kleinman (argued), Burke, Haber & Berick, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellant Henry & Wright Corp.

Saul Eisen, Cleveland, Ohio, pro se.

Before WELLFORD and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

In an unpublished opinion, dated December 10, 1987, in this same controversy, we held that "the District Court should have remanded the case to the Bankruptcy Court for detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P." See In re The Henry & Wright Corp., 835 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.1987). We refer to this opinion and reiterate a portion to set out the essential background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases