KENTUCKY OAKS MALL CO. v. MITCHELL'S FORMAL WEAR, INC.

No. 89-1337.

53 Ohio St. 3d 73 (1990)

KENTUCKY OAKS MALL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. MITCHELL'S FORMAL WEAR, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Fantauzzi and Daniel P. Daniluk, for appellant.

Fleck, Mostov & Schwartz, Jeffrey B. Fleck, Mary DeGenaro, Harmon, Smith & Bridges and Archer D. Smith III, for appellee.


DOUGLAS, J.

Pursuant to Civ. R. 12(B)(2), Mitchell's moved to dismiss appellant's complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court, on that basis, dismissed the complaint and the court of appeals affirmed. Thus, we must first decide whether Mitchell's conduct falls within Ohio's "long-arm statute" or applicable civil rule, and if the statute or civil rule confers personal jurisdiction, then we must determine whether granting jurisdiction comports with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases