PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Appellant, Edward Gischer, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant's allegation of error and the entire record upon which it is based. Since we do not find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law to be clearly erroneous and since we find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the court's denial of appellant's motion pursuant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
