1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 219 Cal.App.3d
  5. 219 Cal.App.3d 1039 (1990)
 

ARONOW v. LaCROIX

Docket No. A025056.

219 Cal.App.3d 1039 (1990)

268 Cal. Rptr. 866

BETTY ARONOW, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARD LaCROIX et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

April 24, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley, Wagner & Kane and Gail Y. Norton for Defendants and Appellants.

Betty Aronow, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

HOLMDAHL, J.*

The trial court found for plaintiff in a malicious prosecution trial, and awarded damages and costs. Defendants appeal the judgment.

The judgment is reversed and the trial court is directed to enter judgment for appellants.

Facts

LaCroix and Schumb became associated in the practice of law in 1964. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases