SPICER, P.J., August 9, 1990.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(1) Entry into defendant's home technically violated Pa.R.Crim.P. 2007.
(2) Judged from the circumstances of this case, the rule violation did not render the search unreasonable.
(3) Evidence seized is not subject to suppression.
DISCUSSION
The court entered findings of fact and, at the request of counsel following...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.