HAVILAND v. GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.

No. 89 CIV. 8463 (LBS).

736 F.Supp. 507 (1990)

Leo HAVILAND, Plaintiff, v. GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. and J. Aron & Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Goldberg, P.C., New York City (Jay Goldberg and Michael G. Berger, of counsel) and Judd Burstein, P.C., New York City (Judd Burstein, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City (Gandolfo V. DiBlasi and Theodore O. Rogers, Jr., of counsel), for defendants.


OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

Plaintiff Leo Haviland brings suit against his former employer Goldman, Sachs & Co. ("Goldman") and its affiliate J. Aron & Co. ("Aron") alleging injury caused by a pattern of racketeering activity that included mail fraud, wire fraud and attempted extortion. The defendants now seek an order pursuant to section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3, staying these judicial proceedings pending the completion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases