LENINS v. K-MART CORP.

No. 8918SC1015.

391 S.E.2d 843 (1990)

Clifton LENINS, Plaintiff, v. K-MART CORPORATION and Daniel Meetze, Defendants. Elsa Cobbe LENINS, Plaintiff, v. K-MART CORPORATION and Daniel Meetze, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Cahoon, Cahoon and Swisher, Greensboro, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Adams Kleemeier Hagan Hannah & Fouts by Clinton Eudy, Jr. and Trudy A. Ennis, Greensboro, for defendants-appellees.


LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs bring forward twenty-two assignments of error. Those assignments of error have been combined below into major topical areas.

I: ALLEGED PREJUDICIAL EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION BY THE TRIAL JUDGE.

Plaintiffs allege that the trial judge made certain statements to the jury which were prejudicial expressions of opinion and were therefore grounds for a new trial.

A. A statement to the jury during jury selection.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases