TIN ORIGINALS v. COLONIAL TIN WORKS

No. 8912SC999.

391 S.E.2d 831 (1990)

TIN ORIGINALS, INC. v. COLONIAL TIN WORKS, INC. and Thomas W. LaRose.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard by John L. Sarratt and Jeffrey A. Batts, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Turner, Enochs, Sparrow, Boone & Falk by Donald G. Sparrow and Laurie S. Truesdell, Greensboro, for defendants-appellees.


EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict in favor of defendants on the issue of fiduciary duty. Additionally, plaintiff asserts that on remand the jury should be instructed that the basis for plaintiff's Chapter 75 claim is breach of fiduciary duty. Finally, plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in accepting the jury's verdict. We are not persuaded and find no error in the trial court.

I. Directed Verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases