1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 906 F.2d
  5. 906 F.2d 312 (1990)
 

AURIEMMA v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 90-1872.

906 F.2d 312 (1990)

John AURIEMMA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 3, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Gubbins, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Ruth M. Moscovitch, Frederick S. Rhine, Kelly R. Welsh, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Office of the Corporation Counsel, Locke E. Bowman, III, Judson H. Miner, Corp. Counsel, City of Chicago Dept. of Law, Chicago, Ill., for City of Chicago, Fred Rice and James Montgomery.

Chester Slaughter, Chicago, Ill., for Donald Hubert.

Jeff D. Harris, Carl Gigante, Foran, Wiss & Schultz, Chicago, Ill., for Investigative Consultants, Inc.

Before COFFEY, FLAUM, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

On March 28, 1990, the district court entered a decision with respect to some but not all of the defendants, adding that the decision "is final and appealable." Neither this statement nor the statement in an accompanying minute order that "[p]laintiffs' motion for entry of a rule 54(b) order is granted" makes the interlocutory order appealable. Rule 54(b) provides for partial final judgment only "upon an express determination that there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases