AURIEMMA v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 84 C 1224.

747 F.Supp. 465 (1990)

John AURIEMMA et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

August 31, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Gubbins, Richard P. Caro, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Earl L. Neal, Langdon D. Neal, Earl L. Neal and Assoc., D. Rainell Rains, Henry F. Field, James D. Montgomery, Corp. Counsel, City of Chicago, Phillip H. Snelling, Matthew J. Piers, Gessler, Flynn, Fleischmann, Hughes & Socol, Ltd., Shelli D. Williams, pro hac vice, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLDERMAN, District Judge:

On August 20, 1990 a divided en banc Seventh Circuit affirmed this court's ruling that Superintendent of Police Fred Rice was not entitled to qualified immunity from suit with regard to the claims presented by plaintiffs in Counts III and V of the Second Amended Complaint.1 Auriemma v. Rice, 910 F.2d 1449 (7th Cir.1990). The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases