BOOHER v. FRUE

No. 8928SC1116.

394 S.E.2d 816 (1990)

98 N.C. App. 570

Richard M. BOOHER and Nancy Ann Brown, Plaintiffs, v. William C. FRUE, Ronald K. Payne and Michael Y. Saunders, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris, Bell and Morris by William C. Morris, Jr., Asheville, for defendants-appellants.

Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman by James E. Walker and James P. Cooney, III, Charlotte, for plaintiffs-appellees.


EAGLES, Judge.

We have narrowed defendant's twenty-five assignments of error and eleven arguments to four categories. First, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Second, defendant argues that the trial court made various errors in its instructions to the jury. Third, defendant argues that the trial court made several evidentiary errors. Finally, defendant asserts that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases