1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 219 Cal.App.3d
  5. 219 Cal.App.3d 973 (1990)
 

SHAW v. McMAHON

Docket No. A045237.

219 Cal.App.3d 973 (1990)

268 Cal. Rptr. 535

TAMIE SHAW, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LINDA McMAHON, as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

April 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard Martland, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Charlton G. Holland III, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Ralph Murphy, Philip Bertenthal, Jodie Berger, Casey McKeever and Richard A. Rothschild for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

The appeal herein constitutes a sequel to this court's previous decision (Shaw v. McMahon (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 417 [243 Cal.Rptr. 26]) and raises an additional issue concerning entitlement to state-only AFDC (aid to families with dependent children) benefits.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases