1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 897 F.2d
  5. 897 F.2d 288 (1990)
 

DAVID COPPERFIELD'S DISAPPEARING, INC. v. HADDON ADVERTISING AGENCY, INC.

No. 89-1198.

897 F.2d 288 (1990)

DAVID COPPERFIELD'S DISAPPEARING, INC., a Nevada corporation, and David Copperfield, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HADDON ADVERTISING AGENCY, INC., an Illinois corporation, and Cash Station, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burton Joseph, Carol Johnson, Edward S. Lichtenstein, Daniel L. Dreiser, Barsy, Joseph & Lichtenstein, Jack Joseph, Joseph & Myers, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellees.

David B. Goroff, Mark Crane, John L. Conlon, Hopkins & Sutter, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellants.

Before EASTERBROOK and MANION, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, Senior District Judge.

GRANT, Senior District Judge.

David Copperfield and his corporate identity, David Copperfield's Disappearing, Inc., brought suit against the defendants, Haddon Advertising Agency, Inc. and Cash Station, Inc., alleging that they breached an agreement to pay for Copperfield's appearance in an ad campaign for Cash Station. Following a jury verdict in favor of Mr. Copperfield, the defendants filed a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases