REED v. DUNHAM

No. 88-1954.

893 F.2d 285 (1990)

Martin Luther REED; Cornelius Maple, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James DUNHAM; Board of Corrections, State of Oklahoma; Larry Meachum; Dept. of Corrections, State of Oklahoma; Robert Mitchell, II; Pardon and Parole Board, State of Oklahoma; Deputy Warden Bill Roller; Security Major Glenn Ridgeway; Correctional Officer Crites; Correctional Officer Wright, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cornelius Maple, Jr., pro se.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Nance, Asst. Atty. Gen. Chief, Federal Div., Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants-appellees.

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR, and TACHA, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiffs, Cornelius Maple, Jr. and Martin Luther Reed, appeal from a district court order dismissing their pro se prison civil rights action as legally frivolous under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases