Here we hold that an interested party may file a cross-complaint to an action which challenges the validity of a redevelopment plan. Accordingly, we direct the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing the court below to vacate its ruling which sustained a demurrer and dismissed petitioner's cross-complaint. (Pfleger v. Superior Court (1985)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. v. SUPERIOR COURT
Docket No. B048536.
223 Cal.App.3d 954 (1990)
273 Cal. Rptr. 18
MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA COUNTY, Respondent; COUNTY OF VENTURA et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 10, 1990.
September 10, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bergman & Wedner, Gregory M. Bergman and Robert M. Mason III for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Cheryl J. Kane, City Attorney, Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Dennis I. Floyd for Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
