Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
The court properly denied defendant's motion to amend the answer to assert a counterclaim for contribution against the father of the infant plaintiff. The undisputed facts submitted on the motion to amend show that defendant's cause of action against the father, based on negligent supervision of the infant plaintiff, lacks merit (see, Holodook v Spencer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.