WENGER v. OREGON UROLOGY CLINIC

A8709-05571; CA A60129.

796 P.2d 376 (1990)

102 Or.App. 665

Robert G. WENGER and Shirley E. Wenger, Respondents, v. OREGON UROLOGY CLINIC, P.C., a Professional Corporation; and David R. Rosencrantz, M.D., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 11, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., P.C., Mark H. Wagner, M. Elizabeth Duncan and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

J.P. Graff, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Graff & O'Neil and Garry L. Kahn, P.C., Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

Defendants appeal the judgment for plaintiff on a medical malpractice claim. They argue that two of the five counts of negligence submitted to the jury were not supported by evidence in the record. We disagree and affirm.

Plaintiff Robert Wenger1 was diagnosed as having Peyronie's disease, a male genital condition that can impair sexual function by producing inelastic scar tissue on the elastic sheath that lines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases